Steve Lawrence updated DAFFODIL-1906:
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.2.0)

> Updates to LICENSE/NOTICE files
> -------------------------------
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-1906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1906
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Infrastructure
>            Reporter: Steve Lawrence
>            Assignee: Steve Lawrence
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
> The following updates should be made to the LICENSE/NOTICE files:
>  # In the source LICENSE file, for all bundled dependencies we should be more 
> explicit about exactly which files/directories are under a non-Apache 
> license. For example saying "we bundle sources from Passera" is not enough. 
> Instead, we should list out the directory paths to the passera 
> files/directories. Also, be more explicit about the license. For example:
>    daffodil-lib/src/main/scala/passera/
>    daffodil-lib/src/test/scala/passera/
>  BSD-3-Clause:
>    (then the license text).
>  # Rename the LICENSE/NOTICE in daffodil-cli something different to clarify 
> that they are not the license for that directory, but are for the binary 
> releases. Something like "LICENSE-bin" would be acceptable.
>  # In the NOTICE, we should list the original authors of all source 
> transferred to ASF (i.e. NCSA, Tresys, and IBM).
>  # Determine if we can split partially licensed files. For example, in 
> daffodil-test/src/test/resources/org/apache/daffodil/ibm-tests/, we have 
> multiple files that were originally created by IBM (transferred to ASF via an 
> SGA), but which include DFDL snippets taken from the Open Grid Forum DFDL 
> Spec, which is under a non-Apache license. If possible and if without too 
> much messiness, we should move the snippets out to separate files so that 
> there are no files that are half-Apache/half OGF licensed.
>  # Revert the LICENSE and NOTICE changes in PR-43 
> ([https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/43)] so that the NOTICE 
> file does not contain information about BSD and other licenses (i.e. the 
> copyright information should be moved back to the LICENSE file)

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to