[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Beckerle updated DAFFODIL-798:
--------------------------------------
Issue Type: Task (was: Improvement)
> verify Errata Test Coverage
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: DAFFODIL-798
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-798
> Project: Daffodil
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: QA
> Affects Versions: s11
> Reporter: Andrew Seyler
> Assignee: Dave Thompson
> Priority: Major
>
> review Wiki Errata Implemented/Not Implemented page:
> https://opensource.ncsa.illinois.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=22052868
> synopsis:
> Every errata that has a "No" status, and is not about unparsing, we need a
> JIRA task, and a requirement (or a few perhaps for the larger errata) to
> track them. Well, I guess we need requirements for all of them - I know Tham
> did an analysis of this not too far back.
> For these errata numbers, I was not sure of the answers. I guessed, but
> someone from test really needs to see if I am right here. In some cases I may
> have been optimistic, others pessimistic versus reality.
> 3.22 - code is there. Do we have test coverage?
> 3.29 - I vaguely recall discussion of this. Did tests get created?
> 2.66 - tbd: what is the behavior and do we test this?
> 2.68 - is this done?
> 2.103 - do we have tests about alignment of individual instances of an array
> vs. the whole array?
> 2.116 - do we check this for defineVariable even?
> 2.117 - do we have test coverage of this. I recall the design discussions
> with Taylor, but not sure if this is tested.
> 2.120 - feels to me like we might have partial coverage of this.
> 2.121 - done? tested?
> 2.127 - done? tested?
> 2.129 - do we check for choice with no branches?
> 2.134 - done? tested?
> comparing to Eratta at http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf/dfdl-wg?folder_id=5485
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
