stevedlawrence commented on a change in pull request #128: Ignore minLength
when lengthKind=explicit
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/128#discussion_r228658050
##########
File path:
daffodil-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/dsom/RuntimePropertyMixins.scala
##########
@@ -367,9 +367,14 @@ trait ElementRuntimeValuedPropertiesMixin
case (Implicit, Binary, HexBinary) => (LengthUnits.Bytes,
maxLengthLong) // fixed length
case (Implicit, Text, String) => (lengthUnits, maxLengthLong) // fixed
length
case (Implicit, Text, AnySimpleType) => (lengthUnits,
textOutputMinLength) // fixed length
- case (Explicit, Text, String) => (lengthUnits, minLengthLong)
- case (Explicit, Binary, HexBinary) => (LengthUnits.Bytes,
minLengthLong)
- case (Explicit, Text, AnySimpleType) => (lengthUnits,
textOutputMinLength)
+ case (Explicit, Text, String) => (lengthUnits, 0L)
+ case (Explicit, Binary, HexBinary) => (LengthUnits.Bytes, 0L)
+ case (Explicit, Text, AnySimpleType) => {
+ if (optLengthConstant.isDefined && (optLengthConstant.get <
minLengthLong))
+ SDE("Explicit dfdl:length of %d is out of range for facet
textOutputMinLength='%d'",
+ optLengthConstant.get, textOutputMinLength)
+ (lengthUnits, 0L)
+ }
Review comment:
Should this check also be done at runtime if dfdl:lengthKind="explicit" but
dfdl:length is an expression? Or is that a validation error that might already
handle?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services