[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793664#comment-16793664
 ] 

Steve Lawrence commented on DAFFODIL-2097:
------------------------------------------

I was thinking we could just clone the calendar before it's used. That way each 
thread gets their own copy. Not sure how that will affect performance, but I 
imainge it wouldn't be signifigantly different from storing in the pstate since 
that would still require creating new objects.

Long term, we sould just switch to a date time implementation that is thread 
safe. ICU has caused nothing but headaches when it comes to datetime stuff.

> Non-thread safe code related to EvCalendar
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-2097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2097
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Back End
>            Reporter: Steve Lawrence
>            Assignee: Steve Lawrence
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.4.0
>
>
> When we use the EvCalendar, this results in a calendar that is often shared 
> among threads. Since this calendar is modify by the SimpleDateTime parse and 
> format functins, different threads using the same calendar could interact and 
> cause spurious failures.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to