Hi all,

Aren't you using ASF Jenkins?

Chris

Holen Sie sichOutlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 1:26:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 2.4.0

Thanks!

Yeah, Travis CI hasn't been all that reliable. I never seen these hangs
before on anything but it and restarting the build always seems to fix
it. And it's difficult to debug so we don't have any shell access to
Travis builds.

I configured Azure Piplines to build commits to my fork and have never
seen the freeze problem--I find it to be much more reliable.
Unfortunately, azure currently requires write access to the repository
so we can't enable it on the main repo, but we can always do it
individually on our forks.

- Steve

On 7/2/19 10:46 PM, Sloane, Brandon wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I merged in 249 and 257.
>
>
> I noticed an extra bit of flakiness with Travis on 249: 
> https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-daffodil/builds/553386320, where the 
> test just froze about 6 minutes in. Re-running the test resolved the issue, 
> so I am assuming it is a Travis issue, not a subtle bug in Daffodil. 
> Hopefully nothing worth thinking about, but something to keep an eye on if it 
> keeps happening.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 1:47:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 2.4.0
>
> Looks like you've just created a PR for this ticket, and the other ones
> mentioned by Mike have been merged and resolved. So there are now just 3
> open pull requests to merge for 2.4.0:
>
>  249: Emit SDE when a type calculator attempts to use an undefined type.
>  256: Bump version to 2.4.0
>  257: Daffodil 2165 type calc double functions
>
> I'll volunteer to be the release manager and start the process once
> these three PRs are merged. Please review these ASAP, since holidays and
> vacations are probably going to start happening and people will start
> disappearing.
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
> On 6/26/19 1:29 PM, Sloane, Brandon wrote:
>> I am working on DAFFODIL-2165 now. The solution I am pursuing changes the 
>> proposed functions for typeCalcs (instead of a seperate String/Int function, 
>> there is just a single function that automatically infers its return type).
>>
>>
>> This involves a fair bit of plumbing to get information to where it needs to 
>> be in the compiler, which might or might not involve significant work avoid 
>> circular dependencies.
>>
>>
>> It would be nice to have this make it into the next release; but the 
>> typeCalc stuff is experimental, so it shouldn't be an issue for us to make 
>> breaking changes to it after the release.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 8:42:53 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 2.4.0
>>
>> We've added a lot of good features and bug fixes to Daffodil since the
>> 2.3.0 release, and it's about that time where we need to start thinking
>> about getting the next release out.
>>
>> One bug I would like to get resolved is DAFFODIL-2163, which I think I
>> can track down this week. Are there any other issues that people think
>> should be resolved for 2.4.0?
>>
>> Maybe we can start the release process next week?
>>
>> - Steve
>>
>
>

Reply via email to