+1 I checked:
- incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE and LICENSE are accurate - RAT check passes - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source - Tested RPM and Windows installers - Validated source release is the same as the git tag - Validated that compiled source jars have the same content as jars in helper binaries On 1/6/20 12:05 PM, Kilo, Olabusayo wrote: > +1 > > I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says > 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'. > > On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) > 2.5.0-rc2. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, > corresponding to slawre...@apache.org<mailto:slawre...@apache.org>, which is > included in the KEYS > file here: > > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST). > > [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Thanks, > - Steve > > > -- > Best Regards > Lola K. >
