I tried this, checked out runtime2-2202 then git pull asf master. There are
like 5 conflicting files, but looks pretty manageable.
I am looking forward to working on runtime2 more soon.
________________________________
From: Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) <inter...@research.ge.com>
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 10:56:32 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Rebasing runtime2-2202 on asf/master
Yes, that makes sense and I believe a merge would actually work. When I have
time later I'll start over, run a git merge asf/master instead of a git rebase
asf/master, fix conflicts again, submit a pull request, and it shouldn't have
any conflicts this time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sloane, Brandon <bslo...@owlcyberdefense.com>
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 11:58 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: EXT: Re: Rebasing runtime2-2202 on asf/master
Since runtime2-2202 is such a long-lived branch, it might be worth considering
a workflow where we merge master into it instead of rebasing onto master.
Once we are ready to actually put runtime2 into master, we can do a
squash+rebase then.
________________________________
From: Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) <inter...@research.ge.com>
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 11:34 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Rebasing runtime2-2202 on asf/master
Hi devs,
I've merged my pull request and landed the Daffodil C code generator on the
"runtime2-2202" development branch. I squashed my commits to one commit and
merged my commit first before trying to rebase runtime2-2202 to get the latest
changes in the main branch. My thinking is that we'll have to continue
building out the generator for some period of time before we merge
runtime2-2202 into the main branch, so we'll have to figure out how to rebase
asf/runtime2-2202 on asf/master and document the process anyway. However, I've
run into trouble with my initial approach and I want to ask for advice and
suggestions before I try another approach.
I have a fork of the incubator-daffodil repository in my personal GitHub
account (tuxji/incubator-daffodil). In my clone of that fork, I have "origin"
set to my fork and "asf" set to apache/incubator-daffodil. I ran these
commands (more or less) after merging my pull request:
$ git fetch -all # pull down all the latest asf changes into my clone $ git
switch runtime2-2202 # get latest asf/runtime2-2202 into my clone $ git switch
-c ji/2202-rebase-1 # do my rebasing changes in a new branch $ git push origin
ji/2202-rebase-1 # update my fork $ git rebase asf/master <edit and fix
conflicts> $ git rebase -continue # complete rebase $ git push origin
ji/2202-rebase-1 # update my fork again <fix a compilation problem found later>
$ git commit -a -no-edit -amend $ git push -force-with-lease
At this point I had updated my ji/2202-rebase-1 branch to rebase my original
commit upon the latest asf/master and this is where I ran into trouble. I
thought I would create a pull request from my fork's ji/2202-rebase-1 branch to
the apache repo's runtime2-2202 branch and it would show everyone exactly what
the rebase had changed. The funny thing is that GitHub says my branch has
conflicts with the asf/runtime2-2202 branch:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/compare/runtime2-2202...tuxji:ji/2202-rebase-1?expand=1
However, I'd already fixed all the conflicts in my branch, and GitHub says my
branch has no conflicts with the asf/master branch:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/compare/master...tuxji:ji/2202-rebase-1?expand=1
GitHub says I can create the pull request anyway, so should I still create the
pull request as in the first link above or is there a better way?
John
