+1 I ran a regression testing suite of 79 DFDL schemas against 3.8.0-rc2. Most of these are internal to Owl, but some are public.
The only failures (6) were expected ones. [fail] (01/79) amhs-tcp-test-data - Expected failure [pass] (02/79) dfdl-agnosc-remedy [pass] (03/79) dfdl-amhs-combined [pass] (04/79) dfdl-amhs-envelope [pass] (05/79) dfdl-army-drrs-lh [pass] (06/79) dfdl-asterix [pass] (07/79) dfdl-asterix-owl [pass] (08/79) dfdl-bmp [pass] (09/79) dfdl-cef [pass] (10/79) dfdl-ces [pass] (11/79) dfdl-cobol-examples [pass] (12/79) dfdl-csv [pass] (13/79) dfdl-disv6 [pass] (14/79) dfdl-edifact [pass] (15/79) dfdl-ethernetIP [pass] (16/79) dfdl-examples-helloworld [pass] (17/79) dfdl-examples-hexwords [pass] (18/79) dfdl-examples-self-descriptive-data [fail] (19/79) dfdl-examples-xslt-csv - Expected Failure. [pass] (20/79) dfdl-flight-plan-owl [pass] (21/79) dfdl-geonames [pass] (22/79) dfdl-gif [pass] (23/79) dfdl-gmtif [pass] (24/79) dfdl-hl7 [pass] (25/79) dfdl-ibm4690-tlog [pass] (26/79) dfdl-iCalendar [pass] (27/79) dfdl-icd-gps-240 [pass] (28/79) dfdl-imf [pass] (29/79) dfdl-imf-icalendar-cse [pass] (30/79) dfdl-ipf-demo [pass] (31/79) dfdl-ipfix [pass] (32/79) dfdl-iso8583 [pass] (33/79) dfdl-janap-128 [pass] (34/79) dfdl-jpeg [pass] (35/79) dfdl-jpeg2000 [fail] (36/79) dfdl-jreap - Expected failure (needs missing extendedcharsets module) [fail] (37/79) dfdl-link16 - Expected failure (needs updates) [pass] (38/79) dfdl-magvar [pass] (39/79) dfdl-mil-std-2045 [pass] (40/79) dfdl-nacha [pass] (41/79) dfdl-nact [pass] (42/79) dfdl-nitf [pass] (43/79) dfdl-notam [pass] (44/79) dfdl-p8 [pass] (45/79) dfdl-pcap [pass] (46/79) dfdl-plc4x-knxnet-ip [pass] (47/79) dfdl-plc4x-s7 [pass] (48/79) dfdl-png [pass] (49/79) dfdl-praat-textgrid [pass] (50/79) dfdl-quasixml [pass] (51/79) dfdl-raster [pass] (52/79) dfdl-shp [pass] (53/79) dfdl-skyview [pass] (54/79) dfdl-sotf [pass] (55/79) dfdl-stanag-5516 [pass] (56/79) dfdl-stanag-5516-with-nact [pass] (57/79) dfdl-syslog [pass] (58/79) dfdl-uscg-ucop-lh [pass] (59/79) dfdl-usmtf [pass] (60/79) dfdl-usmtf-generic [pass] (61/79) dfdl-usmtf-mitre [pass] (62/79) dfdl-vcard [pass] (63/79) dfdl-vmf [pass] (64/79) dfdl-weather [pass] (65/79) gen-oilstock [fail] (66/79) ibm-dfdl-crosstester - Expected Failure [fail] (67/79) janap-otg-schemas - Expected Failure [pass] (68/79) morocco-test-data-cui [pass] (69/79) nexus-xsd [pass] (70/79) noc-header [pass] (71/79) otg-schemas [pass] (72/79) pmmc-itv-dfdl [pass] (73/79) pmmc-itv-xsd [pass] (74/79) rps-42-62-82 [pass] (75/79) udf-geoutil [pass] (76/79) usareur-otg-schemas [pass] (77/79) vmf-pmmc-dfdl [pass] (78/79) vmf-pmmc-xsd [pass] (79/79) zip-layer-transformer On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:37 PM Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc2. > > Since RC1, > * a Keys/Signing issue has been resolved > * a schema-compilation performance issue was found to be non-reproducible > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.8.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1043/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 101EA16F63105E72, > corresponding to mbecke...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS > file here: https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.8.0-rc2. > > For reference, here is a list of all resolved JIRA issues tagged with > 3.8.0: https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.8.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.8.0/ > > Please review and vote. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (Friday 14 June 2024, 12:37pm EDT.US or 2024-06-14T16:37:00Z). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
