+1, I think a release makes perfect sense. On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Hayes < matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to open a discussion about doing our first Apache DataFu release. > I've reviewed the release checklist in the page below and I believe we are > ready to do a release now. All issues under DATAFU-53 (1.3. release tasks) > have been resolved. > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > 1. We can create a source release with a gradle command. See RELEASE.md > for instructions. It creates checksums and signatures. > 2. Automated tests pass (with './gradlew check'). > 3.1. DISCLAIMER is included as file and in Apache DataFu website. > 3.2. LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct > 3.3. Source files have correct license headers (checked with 'gradle rat') > 3.4. Source file provence is clear > 3.5. Dependency licenses are ok > 3.6. Release consists of source code only > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 1.3.0: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DATAFU%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.3.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC%2C%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC > > There were 40 issues fixed, with 14 contributors. For a summary of what > changed, see: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-datafu/blob/master/changes.md > > If there is general agreement on readiness to do a 1.3.0 source release > then I can create a candidate source release and we can hold a vote. > > Thoughts? > > -Matt >
