Yes you are right, that is true :) I'll kick off the vote. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:32 PM, JG Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Weren't there four binding votes? :) > No need for a new RC. This is minor. Hopefully no one Incubator will have > a big problem. > -jg > > > > _____________________________ > From: Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:39 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.1 release RC1 > To: DataFu <dev@datafu.incubator.apache.org> > > > The vote has passed. Final tally below. I'll add the Incubator list to > this thread to start the vote there. > > +1 (binding) x 3 (Matt, Sam, Eyal, Jakob) > +0 x 0 > -1 x 0 > > Eyal, to answer your question, we don't have an organized list at the > moment for what to verify. I can write one up and add it to the wiki. > > Jakob, do I need to create a new RC to update the NOTICE file or can I just > update it in master branch and include it in the next release? > > -Matt > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > * Verified md5 sha > > * Verified sig > > * built, ran unit tests > > * LICENSE looks good > > * Spot checked files for headers, looks good > > > > Minor: The NOTICE file needs to be updated to 2016 > > > > This vote can carry over the Incubator thread. > > -Jakob > > > > > > On 17 July 2016 at 05:48, Eyal Allweil <eyal_allw...@yahoo.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > I did a quick sanity of the udfs that I changed... didn't find anything > > problematic, and checked the hash for the jar. > > > > > > Is there an organized list of what (more) to check? > > > In any event, based on what I did do, I'm +1. > > > > > > On Saturday, July 16, 2016 1:02 AM, Sam Shah <shah...@umich.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gave it a quick spin... +1. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Matthew Hayes <mha...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache DataFu 1.3.1 (incubating). > > >> > > >> The source release candidate RC1 can be downloaded here: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datafu/apache-datafu-incubating-1.3.1-rc1/ > > >> > > >> The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this release candidate can > be > > >> found here: > > >> > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedatafu-1003/ > > >> > > >> This has been signed with PGP key 7BA4C7DF, corresponding to > > >> mha...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file. > > This > > >> key can be found on keyservers, such as: > > >> > > >> *http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7BA4C7DF > > >> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7BA4C7DF>* > > >> > > >> It is also listed here: > > >> > > >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/datafu.asc > > >> > > >> The release candidate has been tagged with release-1.3.1-rc1, which > has > > >> been signed with the same key. I've also created a branch 1.3.1. > > >> > > >> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 1.3.1: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DATAFU%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.3.1%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC%2C%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC > > >> > > >> For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datafu/blob/1.3.1/changes.md > > >> > > >> This release also addresses feedback from the last release process, > > namely: > > >> > > >> * Using an ASF-related email for code signing > > >> * Storing the source release in the right place > > >> * Using a hash other than MD5 > > >> * Releasing artifacts at the same time as the source release > > >> * Updated release documentation based on above > > >> > > >> Please download the release candidate, check the hashes, check the > > >> signatures, test it, and vote. The vote will be open for 96 hours > > (ends on > > >> July 18th 4 pm PST). > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 approve > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >> > > >> My vote: +1 > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Matthew Hayes > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
