On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Justin Mclean
<jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I don't understand this comment. Was there a typo? The 1.3.1 release
>> included both the binaries and sources.
>
> I would suggest making one more release and have both the source and binary
> reviews
> by the incubator. But lets wait to see what your mentors think as they have a
> better idea
> than me re project progress.
It would be great to see 1.3.2 that is nothing else but fix for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-121
>
>> Can you explain more what you mean by this? I don't understand. There is
>> a single source release [3] that can generate binaries [1] and [2].
>
> The source packages there at [1] and [2] is not the source package that was
> voted on (it may be a subset?) that seems like a concern.
To me those are part of the binary vote (see Matthew's explanation bellow).
I checked and it looks like they are not publishing official .tar.gz as par
of the Maven push -- which is perfectly fine.
Thanks,
Roman.
