Thanks Eyal for the triage and identifying these JIRAs.  We don't have any
formal process for deciding how to accept new content.  Ideally someone
would review the JIRA soon after it is opened, triage it and provide
feedback. My feeling is that assuming a contribution has a +1 from a
committer, if there aren't any -1s from someone after a day then it should
be okay to commit.  Thoughts?

I'll do a pass through the ones that were in the process of review.

-Matt

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Eyal Allweil <e...@apache.org> wrote:

> Looking at DataFu's jira, it seems like there are quite a few UDF's which
> are in various states of acceptance to the project. I tried to categorize
> them, skipping those which seemed problematic for some reason, or didn't
> have any patch request attached:
>
>
> *No response from the project:*
>
> New UDF for Histogram / Frequency counting
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-98>
>
> Edit distance <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-87>
>
> Create IncrementalAvroStorage UDF for incrementally processing date
> partitioned data <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-71>
>
> simple hash for near duplicate detection
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-67>
>
>
> Is there any existing process for deciding how to accept new content? I
> don't know if the submitters are still around, but we should probably try
> to give some sort of response.
>
>
> *In a process of review:*
>
> Add datafu.text.ToJson UDF to serialize any relation/field as a JSON String
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-9>
> Add DataFu MR project (obviously not a UDF)
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-51>
>
> UDF's to handle map type <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-34>
>
> NCDG <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-60>
>
> Aho-Corasick <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-65>
>
> New UDF - TupleDiff <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-119>
>
> Some of these seem close to being finished. I think I'll take a look at the
> first one.
>
> Regards,
> Eyal
>

Reply via email to