This sounds better than the objection model. I agree. That's cool if you
want to draft it!

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:07 AM Matthew Hayes <
matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This looks pretty good to me overall.  However for the contributor to
> committer process, I wonder if we should have a vote in the private list
> (as we have been doing) instead of someone implicitly becoming a committer
> if there are no vetoes from the discussion.  My concern is that the message
> may be missed and other committers miss the opportunity to share their
> views in favor or against.  What are your opinions on this?  Also I'd be
> happy to draft the doc by the way.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, it looks good to me. I like it as is.
> >
> > Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
> > russell.jur...@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB
> > <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Sam Shah <shah...@umich.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks good to me. I like the inclusion of non-code contributions as a
> > path
> > > to committer status as well.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Russell Jurney <
> russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Something came up as we prepare DataFu for graduation. We haven't
> > > > documented the process of nominating and approving new committers.
> From
> > > the
> > > > thread with Matt Hayes:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > So far the process has been that I start a discussion in the
> private
> > > list
> > > > > when I think someone has made enough good contributions.  If
> there's
> > > good
> > > > > feedback we vote.  Anyone in the PPMC can initiate this; we just
> > > haven't
> > > > > documented it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A good example of a page that roughly works this way is here:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> > > Becoming+a+Committer
> > > >
> > > > What do folks think of using this as a template for our process? Any
> > > > additions/edits people want?
> > > >
> > > > Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
> > > > russell.jur...@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney>
> FB
> > > > <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
-- 
Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
russell.jur...@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB
<http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com

Reply via email to