Thanks for triaging those, David. I went ahead and closed them. If anybody
disagrees with closing any of these issues, please reopen them with a
comment explaining why they are still relevant.

Andy.


On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM David Rauschenbach <dav...@imap.cc> wrote:

> Working through 3 pages of the oldest open issues, I recommend these 14 to
> be considered for closure.
>
> Because it’s obsolete or has been resolved:
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/146 (Add optional rust
> features for functions in library to keep dependencies down)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/693 (Using string datatype
> from python raises "Exception: The type 13 is not valid”)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/382 (Move
> filter_push_down::split_members to be reused outside of DataFusion)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1060 (Add support of HDFS as
> remote object store)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1007 ([Python]: Expose
> Dataframe.schema() to Python binding)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/955 (Evaluate pyo3 abi3 wheel
> limitations for datafusion python binding)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/949 (Creating dataframe with
> Recordbatch using pyarrow.Table.to_batches gives "type16 not valid error"
> when schema includes date32[day] type)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/839 (Refactor the
> hash_aggregate)
>
>
> Because it relates to arrow-rs, datafusion-python, or Ballista, which are
> now eternal git repos:
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/111 (from JIRA: Tracking
> issue for big endian platforms)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/196 (from JIRA: Review the
> contract between DataFusion and Arrow)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/491 ([Python] Support
> pathlib.Path arguments for ExecutionContext.register_* methods)
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/472 ([Ballista] Improve task
> and job metadata)
>
> Should be closed due to existing comments:
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/179 (Move SortExec partition
> check to constructor)
>
> Should be closed because answers to questions were not provided, or no
> reproducer:
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/563 (switch to using
> AsyncBencher for datafusion benches?)
>
> Regards,
> David

Reply via email to