+1 I don't mind this way. Later we can even have a branch from that "master" called java_8_11 or something, and delete the "master" branch to avoid confusion.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:53 PM Jon Malkin <jmal...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm in favor of the name change for the default branch anyway, so this > seems like a great time. > > +1 > > jon > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024, 2:01 PM Lee Rhodes <lee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oops, modify the close date to Monday, Sep 30th, 1:03 PM Pacific >> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:03 PM Lee Rhodes <lee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I need some PMC approvals on this issue. >>> >>> The code changes required to move the ds-memory code base (java 8 and >>> 11) to Java 17 required a major rewrite of the code. So much so that a >>> merge back to the master branch would be massive, with lots of conflicts. >>> Since we have decided that there will be no further development on Java >>> 8/11, only code fixes, it makes sense to move the default branch to "main", >>> which is where all the Java 17 code exists, and all further development >>> will be based on that branch. >>> >>> Task: Change current default branch "master" to existing branch "main". >>> >>> Only INFRA can do this, and they want to see a discussion/vote on dev@ >>> to demonstrate consensus. >>> >>> The vote will be performed as follows: >>> - This letter will be published on dev@ and remain open for at least >>> 72 hours (excluding weekends and holidays), AND until at least 3 (+1) PMC >>> votes or a majority of (+1) PMC votes are acquired. Anyone in the community >>> can vote. This vote will close no earlier than Thursday, Apr 25, 2024, >>> 10:30 PM PST. >>> >>> Please vote accordingly: >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Lee Rhodes >>> lee...@apache.org >>> >>> +1 (Binding) My vote. >>> >>>
