On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:09 +0100, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > Hi Ross, > > (extensive quoting since you took [EMAIL PROTECTED] out of the queue, which I > put > back :)
Sorry. > > Ok. Somebody got there before me. After finding the area in the code > > that was taking the time, I checked to see if there had been any changes > > in HEAD. A couple of very small changes in fmvwimp.cxx (by kz on Jan 31) > > seem to have made a huge difference in opening times (now 8secs instead > > of 400secs). I didn't see any comment in the issue report though - were > > these changes in relation to this issue? > > Now this is funny. This change was done by myself (kz is a release > engineer who integrated the child workspace where I did this change). It > was in no way related to a performance problem, but to a minor annoyance > (http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60260). Though the bug > had some other small side effects besides 60260, I would not have > expected it to cause that big performance problems. Well, I have to believe my eyes, and unless I'm dreaming, things have improved. As unlikely as it now seems, I would have liked to solve this one just to give something back - but now I'll just have to find something else in there to work on :) I'm very happy in any case ... and can get on with my real project - I'd almost forgotten I had one. By the way, some of those side effects seem to include: - faster updating when moving to next record. - no more strange positioning errors when I bring up my sample form (the one attached to http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61228 ). Many thanks. Cheers. Ross Johnson --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
