On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 09:12 -0500, Tong Li wrote:
> There are also elements which are not available on windows. I went down the
> same path as my dev env are on windows, had quite few days digging and
> pounding my fists against the desk and eventually switched to Ubuntu which
> is a lot simpler. Unless we are serious about supporting windows and put
> some efforts including careful selecting dependent Ruby gems, we will have
> people continue wanting run or develop on windows and having issues. Just
> my 2 cents. Thanks.

I am all for making it possible to run and hack Deltacloud on Windows -
I simply do not have a single Windows machine available where I could
try that myself. But I am more than happy to accept patches to that end.

Do you still have any notes about what issues you ran into with your
Windows setup ? At this point, it would take some enterprising soul to
slog to the issues one-by-one and either document workarounds or fix
them.

As for the thin issue that the OP had: that's a design issue with
rubygems, in that it doesn't distinguish between source and binary
packages (with a sane package mgr, you install binary packages, so that
you do not need a whole build env just to install)

I believe that the best 'fix' for the thin issue is to carefully
document setup under Windows.

David


Reply via email to