Sounds good, too!
But i believe, that many user would believe, that the conversation
automatically ends, too.
Maybe we can find a name to inidicate that the conversation only
automatically starts?


2013/6/10 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>

> To honor the automatic nature
>
> @ConversationAccessScoped
> would fit either
>
> Am 10.06.13 10:18 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >What about AutomaticConversationScoped or similiar?
> >AFAIR CODI starts the conversation automatically
> >
> >Hmm but ViewAccessScoped is also very similiar to a "automatic
> >conversation"... don't know
> >
> >2013/6/10 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>
> >
> >> Good direction
> >>
> >> What about
> >> @UnitOfWorkScoped
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Arne
> >>
> >> Am 06.06.13 18:34 schrieb "Jason Porter" unter
> >><[email protected]>:
> >>
> >> >WebWorkUnit ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
> >> >[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "dialog" is misleading (in the technical context).
> >> >> "workflow" is better but maybe misleading since one of the first
> >> >> associations is a workflow engine
> >> >>
> >> >> regards,
> >> >> gerhard
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2013/6/6 Adrian Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> > Orchestra doc refers to conversation / dialog (even workflow).
> >> >> > DialogScoped would appear to me to be a fine proposition (at least
> >> >> > equivalent to ConversationScoped ;) )
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ----- Mail original -----
> >> >> > De : Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>
> >> >> > À : [email protected]
> >> >> > Cc :
> >> >> > Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21
> >> >> > Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
> >> >> >
> >> >> > #1 imo those names don't fit at all.
> >> >> > #2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea
> >>(please
> >> >> have a
> >> >> > look at [1] and even [2] as well as any other std. scope) and it's
> >>an
> >> >> > important (+ intended) difference.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > regards,
> >> >> > gerhard
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [1]
> >> http://os890.blogspot.co.at/2011/04/slides-codi-conversations.html
> >> >> > [2] http://myfaces.apache.org/orchestra/index.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 <[email protected]>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > DialogScope ?
> >> >> > > FlowScope ? (Possible confusion with JSF 2.2 ?)
> >> >> > > ExtendedConversationScope ?
> >> >> > > CustomConversationScope ?
> >> >> > > ConversationCustomScope ?
> >> >> > > ConversationExtendedScope ?
> >> >> > > ExtendedScope ?
> >> >> > > DSConversationScope ?
> >> >> > > RequestExtendedScope ?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Also should this scope :
> >> >> > > - be started and terminated explicitely a-la "CDI
> >>ConversationScope"
> >> >> > > with conversation.begin() and conversation.end()
> >> >> > > - start automatically, end be terminated explicitly a-la CODI
> >> >> > > ConversationScope? conversation.close()
> >> >> > > ... in addition to be terminated when the "parent"
> >>(Session/Window
> >> >> scope)
> >> >> > > ends..
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > IMHO it seems the first option seems better for us as it may be
> >>used
> >> >> > > in a more generic way and .
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > 2013/6/6 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>:
> >> >> > > > you are very welcome to suggest a better name.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > regards,
> >> >> > > > gerhard
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > 2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 <[email protected]>
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >> Suggestion:
> >> >> > > >> When porting CODI "ConversationScope" to DS, should it be
> >> >>possible
> >> >> to
> >> >> > > >> NOT name this Scope "ConversationScope"
> >> >> > > >> Currently, when using CODI, it is very confusing to have 2
> >> >>different
> >> >> > > >> scopes having the same "ConversationScope" name: the CDI one
> >>and
> >> >>the
> >> >> > > >> CODI. Introduce a lot of confusion when communicating between
> >> >> > > >> developers
> >> >> > > >> Thx
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> 2013/6/1 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> >> >> > > >> > Hi!
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > It's time to go for planing ds-0.5.
> >> >> > > >> > I'd say the release should be pretty small this time. Mostly
> >> >>bug
> >> >> > fixes
> >> >> > > >> and a few minor enhancements. And max 1 or 2 bigger bullet
> >> >>features.
> >> >> > > >> > The goal is to release ds-0.5 end of this month.
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > A few things on the list as I remember so far:
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > * Finish graduation and apply latest changes to our Docs.
> >> >> > > >> > * Servlet module. Please add JIRAs which feature you like to
> >> >>see
> >> >> in
> >> >> > > this
> >> >> > > >> module
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > * Improve the JSF module. We still miss a few features from
> >> >>CODI
> >> >> and
> >> >> > > >> seam-faces
> >> >> > > >> >  . improve ClientWindow handling
> >> >> > > >> >  . improve the typesafe navigation
> >> >> > > >> >  . add @ConfigurationScoped and @ViewAccessScoped
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > * Improve the configuration
> >> >> > > >> >  . brainstorming about configuration 'categories' as
> >>requested
> >> >>a
> >> >> few
> >> >> > > >> times already
> >> >> > > >> >  . ProjectStage and/or property specific configuration
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > This DISCUSS will be closed in 72h. New feature requests
> >>after
> >> >> that
> >> >> > > time
> >> >> > > >> will be handled in deltaspike-0.6 (unless they are blockers).
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > The timeframe I would suggest:
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > * Implement new features during 2013-06-12
> >> >> > > >> > * Bugfixing and documentation until 2013-06-19
> >> >> > > >> > * start with the release on 2013-06-23
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > Any objection, ideas, feedback?
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >> > txs and LieGrue,
> >> >> > > >> > strub
> >> >> > > >> >
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Jason Porter
> >> >http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to