-1 "bv" was coined by the eg, is used in the spec. document and other areas since years (and it fits to the abbreviations used for other spec. modules). -> +1 for "bv"
regards, gerhard 2013/6/17 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > gee, was too fast. > > Amending my vote to > > +0 (I'm fine with both) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 7:28 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name > > > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: John D. Ament <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: > >> Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 2:42 > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name > >> > >> [+1] beanval > >> > >> BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours. > >> > >> John > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> All > >>> > >>> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are > > the > >> two > >>> names the seem to have the least angst: > >>> > >>> beanval > >>> bean-validation > >>> > >>> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for > >> "beanval" but -1 > >>> is for "bean-validation" > >>> > >>> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm > > not > >>> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to > > other > >>> names I saw in a quick google search. > >>> > >>> - John > >>> > >> > > >
