[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13755710#comment-13755710
]
Mark Struberg commented on DELTASPIKE-405:
------------------------------------------
{quote}
assignable to the upper bound, if any, of the type variable
{quote}
I'm a bit confused now to be honest.
In List<? extends T>, T is the upper bound. Imo the 'upper bound' is the most
common denominator of the possible types. If there is no 'extends X' then
Object.class is the upper bound, right?
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/upperBounded.html
In pseudo-code the meaning of the quoted paragraph is imo
{code}
required_actual_type.assignableFrom(bean_type_upper_bound)
{code}
In any case the important fact for me is that the _intention_ of both Weld and
OWB is the same and we like to allow this specific use case.
> producer for JsfMessage<T> does not match CDI-1.1 rules
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DELTASPIKE-405
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-405
> Project: DeltaSpike
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JSF-Module
> Affects Versions: 0.4
> Reporter: Mark Struberg
> Assignee: Mark Struberg
> Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> Some containers don't find the JsfMessageProducer as it is of a generic type
> <T>.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
