+1 The core is very stable. Users are afraid by 0.5 or 0.6 in terms of quality. >From my experience with DS, core module at least is very stable.
JSF and Data work fine as well. Currently, we don't have a 1.0 mainly because some other modules are not totally merged nor stable maybe, right? Jean-Louis 2014-02-07 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > Agree, it sounds good but I'd rather focus on (finnally!) shipping DS-1.0 > for now. > > I'll give it a tough test drive in the next weeks to see what we miss > before the milestone. > > John, you could probably do a draft on github? > > LieGrue, > stru > > > > > On Friday, 7 February 2014, 6:15, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > >I see the use case but deltaspike needs so much work on existing code > (jsf, > >security, transactional, data for the one I see) that I think we shouldnt > >add new things while we dont propose something working fine out of the > box. > > > >Wdyt? > > > >Le 7 févr. 2014 02:31, "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > >> Hi all > >> > >> I've been working a bit on a POC. The idea is to run a light weight > >> Java SE application that does some basic bootstrapping and container > >> services. The SE app would be configured with a basic socket listener > >> using Netty and delegate requests to a REST provider. The idea behind > >> it is that CDI forms the low level core of the "container", where a > >> developer can deploy services they build on their own. The > >> application is meant to be an API type server (deploy REST APIs) that > >> runs using Netty, starts up a CDI container using DeltaSpike Container > >> Control API. The launch module would handle the basic bootstrap of > >> the rest provider, instantiating the CDI container using > >> ContainerControl, and handle the necessary bootstrap for lookup up > >> resources and registering with the provider. This type of module > >> would compete with Spring Boot. > >> > >> Currently what I have leverages Weld 2.1.1 and RestEasy. The > >> equivalent should work for CXF. There's no hard dependency on Weld. > >> > >> I was thinking the module structure would include an api, spi, > >> impl-resteasy and impl-cxf. > >> > >> Some things I'd like to add: > >> > >> - Automatic bootstrap of JPA (via JPA module) > >> - Transaction intercepting (probably need to pull in the Geronimo lib) > >> - Probably also register some providers automatically as well. > >> > >> Let me know your thoughts. > >> > >> John > >> > > > > > -- Jean-Louis
