with that argument (that it is something different), we don't have to rename other parts (because they are different anyway).
regards, gerhard 2014-02-15 8:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > Well, I do not get the reason at all. > > If someone could tell me the benefits of this move, then I'd be happy. > > From my pov it is not only unnecessary but really wrong. > a.) changing the maven coordinates should always ONLY be done if there is > a strong reason imo. Remember that the old artifact-ids are still on > maven.central and will confuse users. We should really avoid GAV changes to > not clutter up our project in maven.central. > > b.) CdiCtrl is really something completely different than ds-core and it's > modules. I would also NOT move the test module under /modules but under an > own top level directory. Plus the test module is not released yet, so we > can rename it, move it, etc > > I just don't get any of the benefits we would get with renaming and moving > CdiCtrl, thus I'm -1. There also have been no argument for it so far. A 'it > looks different' does not count imo as it IS something different. If you > like to have them look same then rename test-control to testCtrl... > > c.) while we are at it: originally I did craete a separate deltaspike > directory because I thought that the site and documentation will be > maintained inside our git repo. But with our CMS and the docs happening > outside our source repo we do not need it anymore. Thus should we move all > the content from ./deltaspike/ to ./? This is something which really should > be considered to be done before 1.0. > > LieGrue, > strub
