Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix the Tx stuff.
In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move to 1.0. wdyt? LieGrue, strub On Monday, 17 February 2014, 10:06, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi > > >can we wait 1 or 2 weeks (no more) to see if we can sort out @Repo/@Tx >stuff? Basically I'm waiting after it for months and this is blocker >to be used ATM. >Romain Manni-Bucau >Twitter: @rmannibucau >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > >2014-02-17 9:57 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >> back 2 the topic, please! >> >> I'd say we should approach 1.0 NOW. >> >> DeltaSpike core and a few other modules is really rock solid already since a >> year or so. It is also used heavily in production already. >> There will always be some modules which are not so perfectly mature at >> times. E.g. if we will add a new module. >> >> Thus I already did propose a methology which would fix this shortcoming: >> We might introduce an 'ample page' which contains the status of each project >> - stable / ready /in progress >> >> You know, the traffic light thingy where green means the module (e.g. >> deltaspike-core) is stable and the API will not change or we will at least >> be backward compatible unless we do a major new version. >> Orange means that the module has been tested and looks good. Whereas red >> means that the api might change still. >> >> What road blockers do we have before 1.0? >> Please note that there is always something one can do better - but this >> should not hinder us from releasing until something is really broken. >> Also the documentation is *not* a show stopper - it is perfectly fine to >> ship this later as our CMS is completely asynchronous. >> >> >> So what BLOCKERS do you see before I go and press the release button? >> Like to do that on Wednesday... >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 16 February 2014, 23:14, Ove Ranheim <oranh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> That's reasonable enough. >>> >>> >>>On 16. feb. 2014, at 23:02, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Probably because we've become busy with some other projects and priorities >>>> :(-- >>>> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ove Ranheim <oranh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The commit graph shows too few committers.. and I appreciate your work! >>>>> I also notice too few Redhat/JBoss Weld/Seam committers left on the >>>>> project. How come? >>>>> /ove >>>>> On 16. feb. 2014, at 22:10, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> hi ove, >>>>>> >>>>>> i was only talking about the commits. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> gerhard >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.irian.at >>>>>> >>>>>> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - >>>>>> JavaEE Consulting, Development and >>>>>> Courses in English and German >>>>>> >>>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-02-16 22:07 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko >>>>>> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 Ove >>>>>>> We are really late for an 0.6. I would release 0.6 this/next month and >>>>>>> after that, lets finish 1.0. >>>>>>> We should fix all open issues and finish the documentation! >>> >>> >>> > > >
