I think this has to be expected behavior in CDI 1.1.  This annotation
is 1.1 specific.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Ove Ranheim <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using DS, Weld and Tomcat and in the log I found these messages.
>
> 20:41:31.199 [Thread-1] INFO  org.jboss.weld.Version - WELD-000900: 2.1.2 
> (Final)
> 20:41:31.608 [Thread-1] INFO  org.jboss.weld.Bootstrap - WELD-000101: 
> Transactional services not available. Injection of @Inject UserTransaction 
> not available. Transactional observers will be invoked synchronously.
> 20:41:31.870 [Thread-1] WARN  org.jboss.weld.Event - WELD-000411: Observer 
> method [BackedAnnotatedMethod] protected 
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.message.MessageBundleExtension.detectInterfaces(@Observes
>  ProcessAnnotatedType<Object>) receives events for all annotated types. 
> Consider restricting events using @WithAnnotations or a generic type with 
> bounds.
> 20:41:31.888 [Thread-1] WARN  org.jboss.weld.Event - WELD-000411: Observer 
> method [BackedAnnotatedMethod] protected 
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.message.MessageBundleExtension.detectInterfaces(@Observes
>  ProcessAnnotatedType<Object>) receives events for all annotated types. 
> Consider restricting events using @WithAnnotations or a generic type with 
> bounds.
> 20:41:31.902 [Thread-1] WARN  org.jboss.weld.Event - WELD-000411: Observer 
> method [BackedAnnotatedMethod] protected 
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.exclude.extension.ExcludeExtension.vetoBeans(@Observes
>  ProcessAnnotatedType<Object>, BeanManager) receives events for all annotated 
> types. Consider restricting events using @WithAnnotations or a generic type 
> with bounds.
> 20:41:31.904 [Thread-1] WARN  org.jboss.weld.Event - WELD-000411: Observer 
> method [BackedAnnotatedMethod] protected 
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.exclude.extension.ExcludeExtension.vetoBeans(@Observes
>  ProcessAnnotatedType<Object>, BeanManager) receives events for all annotated 
> types. Consider restricting events using @WithAnnotations or a generic type 
> with bounds.
>
> Is this normal and excepted behaviour?
>
> Ove
>

Reply via email to