Serialization works fine in my test project but i created an issue for the
AppScoped problem! ;)


2014-06-19 0:27 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>:

> I will provide an example on friday!
>
>
> 2014-06-18 19:30 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>
> +1
>>
>> Le mercredi 18 juin 2014, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> > Feels like it should default to @ApplicationScoped? I see no reason why
>> not
>> > at least
>> >
>> >
>> > On 18 June 2014 13:12, Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> or: @Repository(scope = ApplicationScoped.class)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-06-18 12:25 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> [email protected]
>> >> >:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Thomas,
>> >> >
>> >> > my problem is that when i inject it in a ViewScoped bean, it tries to
>> >> > serialize it but it isn't serializable.
>> >> > Could we make it configurable? Maybe we could declerate the scope on
>> the
>> >> > repo:
>> >> >
>> >> > @Repository
>> >> > @ApplicationScoped
>> >> > public abstract class MyRepository extends
>> >> > AbstractEntityRepository<Mitarbeiter, Long>
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> > Thomas
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2014-06-18 12:20 GMT+02:00 Thomas Hug <[email protected]>:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Thomas
>> >> >> We made some efforts to get rid of scope-related parts in the impl,
>> but
>> >> I
>> >> >> don't think there's anything speakin' against a @NormalScoped repo -
>> >> >> PartialBeans do support that.
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Thomas
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
>> >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > AFAICS repositories are non-scoped, right?
>> >> >> > Isn't it possible to make them appscoped?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards,
>> >> >> > Thomas
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>
>

Reply via email to