hi rafael,

thx - it's great to see the progress!
if it isn't on your list already: the final pages should also contain the
license header (at least as a comment - see our current pages).

regards,
gerhard



2014-09-11 23:15 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[email protected]>:

> Hi John!
>
> Em 9/11/14, 15:23, John D. Ament escreveu:
>
>> Rafael,
>>
>> Couple of things I'd recommend.
>>
>> - We should put the documentation adoc's in a documentation folder.  This
>> will allow us to upload to different folders, as I'm sure we'll want to cut
>> over the remaining parts of the site to adoc to make it more consistent and
>> easier to update.  We'll also have to turn on the preserveDirectories
>> option in the maven plugin.
>>
> Good point. But them then we should change the name of the folder to
> something else but REPO_ROOT/documentation.
> My idea is that We could start with the documentation first and update it
> later as our needs. My idea is to have at least the documentation migrated
> ASAP.
> Agreed ?
>
>> - Can we upgrade to asciidoctor 1.5.0?  The only issue I saw was a
>> removed import in the template erb file.
>>
> I had issues with asciidoctor 1.5.0. I'll investigate it tomorrow.
>
>> - I'm a bit concerned with us uploading to the doc site before the source
>> files are checked in.  this is something we'll likely need to work out via
>> process.
>>
> +1 for "this is something we'll likely need to work out via process."
>
>> - To delete the current files, we need to update the links on the page to
>> go to /documentation.
>>
> +1. I can do that after the proposed branch got merged to upstream.
>
>>
>> I'm also wondering if we should now introduce a top level pom that can be
>> used during releases to ensure the docs get properly versioned.  Then we
>> can execute a release and upload the site during the release process.
>>
> I believe that a top level pom is helpful and we could also make the
> documentation part of the distribution zip. But that should be a second
> step handled by another Jira ticket and separated from this migration step.
>
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Rafael Benevides <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     I worked on documentation migration from MarkDown to Asciidoc.
>>
>>     - The syntax-highlighter was checked
>>     - The intra-document links was checked
>>     - The the anchor links was checked
>>     - The table format was checked
>>     - Minor adjustments needed
>>
>>     The sources were placed here until we complete the review:
>>     https://github.com/rafabene/deltaspike/tree/asciidoc-
>> migration/documentation/src/main/asciidoc
>>
>>     They were published at http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/
>>
>>     Once that they got merged to Git, the SVN files should be removed
>>     to avoid any misunderstood.
>>
>>     Please, let me know if you find any issues.
>>
>>     Thanks
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
>>     JBoss Developer
>>     M: +55-61-9269-6576 <tel:%2B55-61-9269-6576>
>>
>>     Red Hat
>>
>>     Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>     collaboration.
>>     See how it works at www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>>     LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/3258288> Youtube
>>     <https://www.youtube.com/redhatlatam>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to