@thomas:
imo that's just the first step and we should define a simple api (+ move
the rest to the impl. module).

regards,
gerhard



2015-04-29 8:13 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:

> Looks good but api without impl looks a little bit weird :)
>
> 2015-04-29 0:59 GMT+02:00 rafabene <g...@git.apache.org>:
>
> > Github user rafabene commented on a diff in the pull request:
> >
> >     https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/pull/30#discussion_r29297290
> >
> >     --- Diff: deltaspike/modules/proxy-utils/api/pom.xml ---
> >     @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> >     +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >     +<!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
> > more contributor
> >     +   license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this
> work
> > for additional
> >     +   information regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this
> > file to
> >     +   you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you
> may
> > not use
> >     +   this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a
> > copy of
> >     +   the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless
> > required
> >     +   by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed
> > under the
> >     +   License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR
> > CONDITIONS
> >     +   OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
> > specific
> >     +   language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
> > -->
> >     +<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xmlns:xsi="
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="
> > http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
> http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd
> > ">
> >     +   <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
> >     +
> >     +   <parent>
> >     +           <groupId>org.apache.deltaspike.modules</groupId>
> >     +           <artifactId>proxy-utils-module-project</artifactId>
> >     +           <version>1.3.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
> >     +   </parent>
> >     +
> >     +   <artifactId>deltaspike-proxy-module-api</artifactId>
> >     +
> >     +   <name>Apache DeltaSpike Proxy-Utils-Module API</name>
> >     +
> >     +        <build>
> >     +        <plugins>
> >     +            <plugin>
> >     +                <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> >     +                <artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
> >     +                <version>2.3</version>
> >     +                <configuration>
> >     +
> > <shadedArtifactAttached>false</shadedArtifactAttached>
> >     +
> > <createDependencyReducedPom>false</createDependencyReducedPom>
> >     +
> > <promoteTransitiveDependencies>true</promoteTransitiveDependencies>
> >     +                    <relocations>
> >     +                        <relocation>
> >     +                            <pattern>org.objectweb.asm</pattern>
> >     +
> > <shadedPattern>org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.proxy.asm5</shadedPattern>
> >     --- End diff --
> >
> >     I'm not sure. Anyway, I think I should change this package.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
> your
> > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
> feature
> > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working,
> please
> > contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA
> ticket
> > with INFRA.
> > ---
> >
>

Reply via email to