[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-897:
----------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.4.2)
                   1.5.0

> discuss configuration of a ClassDeactivator
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DELTASPIKE-897
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-897
>             Project: DeltaSpike
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
>            Assignee: Gerhard Petracek
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> currently it's needed to configure a custom ClassDeactivator via 
> apache-deltaspike.properties, but not via 
> META-INF/services/org.apache.deltaspike.core.spi.activation.ClassDeactivator
> this limitation was required, because it isn't possible to 
> deactivate/overrule a ClassDeactivator configured via the std. spi-config, 
> but via config-sources and ordinals it's possible to overrule it.
> that's basically fine, but not that intuitive esp. because it's a spi for a 
> low-level functionality -> users expect a std. spi-config. therefore we 
> should combine both or provide a corresponding hint/warning.
> #1
> usually there is just one configured ClassDeactivator and therefore we can 
> support both config formats easily. once there is at least one 
> ClassDeactivator configured in apache-deltaspike.properties, we can ignore 
> all implementations of ClassDeactivator configured via the std. spi-config. 
> that allows to deactivate/overrule such a configuration. currently we just 
> support one ClassDeactivator at runtime. that's limited by the config-format 
> itself. since a std. spi-config allows multiple config-entries, we would need 
> to use an internal instance which aggregates instances of the configured 
> classes.
> #2
> we just check if there is an active spi-config for 1-n implementations of 
> ClassDeactivator and in such cases we log a warning that they are ignored and 
> how to configure a ClassDeactivator correctly (and that only one active 
> implementation is supported).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to