1+ romain But wdyt about adding something to DS for JEE6/7 users? 2015-09-19 9:23 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>:
> +1 > I really thought the same, when I read that proposal. > > Cheers, > Arne > > Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet. > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > Datum: 18.09.2015 16:28 (GMT+01:00) > An: [email protected] > Cc: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [Proposal] CdiManagedRunnable > > Hi > > I like the idea but isnt it close enough of concurrency utilities to kind > of put it in this spec? There is this proxy factory which could/should > support scopes IMO. > > CDI has few thread requirements which is good IMO so I would put it in the > "thread" spec. > > Romain > Le 18 sept. 2015 07:23, "Martin Kouba" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I think it's a good idea. Weld has a similar API [1], except it's focused > > solely on the "thread-local-based context". We are also considering the > use > > of an interceptor to active/deactivate the ThreadContext per business > > method invocation [2]. > > > > I wonder, whether this should be standardized in CDI 2.0. It seems to me > > that CDI SE lacks some built-in contexts. Unlike Java EE where the > built-in > > scopes align with the lifecycle of EE components (@RequestScoped, > > @SessionScoped, etc.). > > > > Martin > > > > [1] > > > > > http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/environments.html#_thread_context > > > > [2] > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1905 > > > > > > Dne 10.9.2015 v 18:02 Thomas Andraschko napsal(a): > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> it's often required to manual activate scopes in a async > threads/runnables > >> if you don't use JavaEE 7. > >> I already used this in 3-4 projects in the last 3 years. > >> > >> My current API looks like: > >> > >> CdiManagedRunnable - A abstract class with implements Runnable and > starts > >> the RequestScoped via ContextControl and a new scope called ThreadScope > >> RequestScoped is optional, CdiManagedRunnable#isRequestScopedSupported > >> return false per default and can be overwritten by the user. > >> > >> ThreadContext - A AbstractContext implementation which a static static > >> ThreadLocal<ContextualStorage> > >> > >> ThreadContextExtension > >> ThreadScoped > >> > >> WDYT? Is this useful for other people too? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Thomas > >> > >> > > -- > > Martin Kouba > > Software Engineer > > Red Hat, Czech Republic > > >
