Hi Gerhard, sorry for not getting back sooner...
So far, I figured out that the regression I've seen was introduced between 1.5.0 and 1.5.1, and not in 1.5.2 - I tested with an application that was running on DS 1.5.0 previously.
It seems I missed the end of the vote by a few hours, otherwise I would change my vote now, and I apologize for any premature confusion.
By the way, the regressions I've been talking about, now and previously for some 1.4.x releases, are not related to Pax CDI or OSGi at all.
They all relate to my current commercial closed source daytime projects which are based on WildFly 9. There's no OSGi inside, and nothing out of the ordinary, I would think. We just happen to be using DeltaSpike Data for our persistence layer, and we've been bitten by incompatible changes after upgrading DS a couple of times now.
I'll try to isolate some of my issues and contribute new tests for those use cases that have been fragile for us, and there's a couple of ideas I'd like to discuss in separate threads.
Best regards, Harald Am 08.12.2015 um 01:44 schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
hi harald, since we have seen just 3 commits in the data-module (for this release), i guess it's due to DELTASPIKE-1009 which fixes a regression caused by DELTASPIKE-594. however, we couldn't test it with an osgi-based application. as mentioned in the past: everybody is very welcome to help with the osgi part (esp. with tests) or we have to drop the unofficial (and still partial) osgi-support. regards, gerhard
