the point was it is already there and even @asf so what would be the added value of DS?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-11-28 12:23 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > Romain, > > Portability is one, but even then if you look at Feign its not reliant on > JAX-RS either. > > John > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:39 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey John > > > > What is the point? Being portable whatever jaxrs impl? > > > > Maybe we can try to have cxf doing it with few refactoring? > > > > Batche has one trivial impl as well but sounds like wider than DS and > > belonging to a jaxrs impl to me. > > > > Le 28 nov. 2016 04:28, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > > Sorry to revive this old topic. > > > > > > Personally I'd be in favor of doing something like this. Are you > > thinking > > > of just doing an integration between Feign and CDI or actually fully > > > implement the REST client as a proxy? > > > > > > I was thinking about it... both CXF and RestEasy provide this, but the > > > JAX-RS EG isn't moving forward on a proxy based client and Jersey > doesn't > > > support this. So it would make standardizing hard. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:47 AM Thomas Andraschko < > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi @all, > > > > > > > > i just discovered the following: https://github.com/OpenFeign/feign > > > > > > > > WDYT? Would it be cool to build a similar feature as DS module? (i > > think > > > > users could also just use feign directly) > > > > We already have the proxy stuff, we would "just" need some > annotations > > > and > > > > a handler to parse/execute them. > > > > It would be very similar to the data module. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > >
