+1 I always disliked to add Quartz to my dependencies to get simple "run this code every minute" behavior.
Christian 2018-01-05 19:03 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>: > +1 due to the fact that we just used it to support cron-expressions (there > was no other explicit reason). > however, we have to keep it as an optional dependency and delegate to it > once it's on the classpath, because some users use Scheduler#unwrap for > more advanced cases. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2018-01-05 17:39 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > > Hi folks! > > Since I've now had a few complaints about Quartz 'phoning home' (totally > > useless update check), I'm really inclined to just kick out quartz and > > implement the Scheduler ourselves. > > Implementing a proper Scheduler is not that complicated anyway, so do we > > like to roll this ourselves? > > Or do you think I underestimate the effort? > > > > LieGrue,strub > > > -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
