SethiPandi opened a new pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/pull/109


   Since we're using DeltaSpike we've ended up making some libraries to add a 
little on top, if it's alright, I thought they could be put in the `Add-ons` 
section of the documentation.  
   
   These libraries are rather small, but do work, are being maintained, and are 
unit tested.
   
   ---
   
   As a side note, there appears to be some redundancy in the documentation.
   
   There is a dedicated "Add-ons" page here:  
   https://deltaspike.apache.org/addons.html
   
   But there is also an "Add-ons" heading under "External Resources" here:  
   https://deltaspike.apache.org/external.html#_add_ons
   
   Is this intentional? I think it may be better if the Add-ons section was 
removed from External Resources, and the information conveyed there could be 
merged with the dedicated Add-ons page?  
   This allows the Add-ons documentation to be centralized rather than spread 
across the documentation.  
   (It's a minimal change, so with consent I could just do it in this PR.)  
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to