The web app/service on our VM can be seen as a rudimentary step towards some "user agent tester". I don't know, if we wanted people to subscribe/login just to use it like DeviceAtlas?;-)
They certainly must if they want to contribute device data. That is an important feature we should provide if Apache Foundation allows it from a contributor/IP point... Werner On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Volkan YAZICI <[email protected]> wrote: > AFAIC, we really need to provide a web-based online interface the the > existing DM functionality as others[1,2,3]. > > [1] http://51degrees.com/Resources/User-Agent-Tester > [2] http://tools.scientiamobile.com/ > [3] https://deviceatlas.com/device-data/user-agent-tester > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Reza Naghibi < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > So now that our project is picking up, I would like to better market the > > strengths of this project. For now, im thinking of a blurb on the > homepage. > > Here is what I have so far: > > > > -We are the only truly open source DDR out there. Our data and API are > > completely free and open. We have the backing of the Apache Software > > Foundation. > > -We have a state of the art classification API. Unlike other APIs which > > classify and detect devices using a mix of code, parsing, and regex, we > are > > purely pattern driven. Our classification API is domain independent. > > -With our upcoming 2.0 release, we will be the the only DDR which allows > > devices to be classified using 3 independent and unrelated aspects: > device, > > operating system, and browser. > > -We are a great choice for HTTP log analysis. DeviceMap can easily > > classify your traffic logs to better understand your user device > > composition. > > > > Thoughts? Additions? Better wording? Also, what about browsermap? What > can > > we say about that aspect of this project? > > > > Also, I just want to add that I think realtime HTTP device classification > > is just as relevant as ever. Companies are always asking for it. Also, > from > > first hand experience, I am still seeing large complex webapps fail when > > trying to be 100% css responsive. These projects would have greatly > > benefited from simple backend device templating and/or user choice of > > templating. Ex: Do you want to view our Lite or Desktop site? > > >
