Was it manually gathered or (for some specs like pixel density) anything calculated?
As of now, the release year is not in the DDR, but also along Bertrand's question properties are very generic in the W3C API so a property like "release_year" or name change of "device_os" or "device_os_version" to "default_os", etc. could be done as maintenance to the 1.x format very easily. Werner On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected] > wrote: > Right now that field isn't really defined well nor is it used directly in > the data. I just put it on there to give devices a bit of hardware context. > > Please look at this as an example from our previous release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-76 > > > I stuck to CPU, GPU, and memory. > > From: Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 2:19 AM > Subject: Re: Collecting Specs for UAs > > One more question: What does "hardware" in the list refer to? > > > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The entire UA collection tickets (DMAP-94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, 102) I > > have submitted to JIRA are being marked as NeedsSpec, which is fine. In > the > > explanation, I am being told that I need to collect the following > > properties for each UA: > > > > - id > > - vendor > > - model > > - marketing name > > - resolution-x > > - resolution-y > > - pixel-density-ppi > > - release-year > > - default-os > > - hardware > > > > I have some questions regarding these properties: > > > > - How other people collect this sort of information? Is there a > > certain set of steps that I can follow? I was considering writing a > crawler > > on top of a web-based proprietary UA resolver, would that be ok > considering > > the licensing issues? > > - Is there scheme am I supposed to follow for the *id* attribute? Or > > something descriptive would be just fine? > > - *resolution-x/y* means the width and height of the screen in pixels, > > right? > > - How do we calculate *pixel-density-ppi*? > > > > Best. > > > > >
