On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...It's not necessarily about 2 or 3 Java clients (some may be W3C compliant,
> others not) but the question, if DeviceMap wants to offer at least one W3C
> DDR standard implementation for languages and platforms where this is
> justified....

As far as I'm concerned, if someone is willing to maintain a W3C DDR
client implementation that's fine.

The question is whether this has impact on the device data set that's
going to be shared between the different client implementations. That
data set is the focus of DeviceMap, so it's important to make sure it
can be maintained easily without conflicting requirements. Do people
see potential problems with that?

-Bertrand

Reply via email to