We just need that Jenkins instance for reproducible facts, whoever feels able and capable of getting that into place after it was down for so many months...
Werner On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > Does mvn clean install work consistently and for everyone? (not just a > single person) now, that's the important question. > > It was frustrating having it break from fixing one issue (the Java 8 > inconsistency) only to spot another. And the trunk of at least 24h ago with > a matching data 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT simply didn't build without a failing unit > test. > > > Werner > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Reza Naghibi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Well it looks like "classifier unit test cleanup" may have fixed a >> build problem that was earlier denied >> >> Absolutely not. That commit simply changed the case on unit tests method >> declarations [0]. I commented on the JIRA your issue was could not be >> replicated and its likely due to having a bad snapshot data version[1]. Now >> that its working means that you maybe stabilized your dev environment? If >> you still uncertain, please revert the commit and demonstrate the problem >> comes back. >> >> This is the last thing im going to say. I think there is still a lot of >> double speak going on here. For example, I very clearly asked for a commit >> [2] to be reverted [3] and it was repeatedly ignored, and then incorrectly >> changed [4], and finally my forced revert [5] cleared up the issue [6]. Yet >> I was the one who is doing unilateral action? I don't think people here >> understand how frustrating this is for me. >> >> [0] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649708 >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-122 >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1648973 >> [3] http://s.apache.org/Dwd >> [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649129 >> [5] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649145 >> [6] http://s.apache.org/X4q >> >> --- >> >> >> From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:11 AM >> Subject: Re: JIRA tickets and setting >> >> Well it looks like "classifier unit test cleanup" may have fixed a build >> problem that was earlier denied. >> Should be able to run against Maven and also see, what >> "devicemap/trunk/devicemap/java/classifier_w3c_simple/" is about. >> >> While we had a thread yesterday about a theoretical possibility of a >> combined W3C compliant module, "just committing something without design, >> discussion or consent by anyone in the PMC" has been a repeated theme I >> hope soon improves for the better?;-O >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Reza Naghibi >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > ...This has been a repeated theme (statements with no references).... >> > >> > I agree that "speaking in URLs" helps tremendously. >> > >> > Doesn't always have to be full URLs but things like DMAP-1234, svn >> > revision 123456 and http://markmail.org/thread/bp7dgz22ojns3m3s work >> > fine. >> > >> > -Bertrand >> > >> >> >> > > >
