I second the idea that we should not mirror Git to SVN, but get rid off SVN entirely.
For the case of multiple Git repositories, I believe current form of Apache DeviceMap is relatively compact and would probably not expand in a foreseeable future. Hence, I would like to keep the code base in a single repository. On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected] > wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Can you (or Radu, since Browsermap already uses Git) give us a little > more > > details on what's necessary for that?... > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/docs/switching-to-git.html has basic > migration info but I suppose most of that is automated by now (haven't > been involved in any svn-to-git migration at the ASF myself so far). > > The actual migration is done by the ASF infra team, but someone needs > to drive the effort, create the appropriate infra jira issues, discuss > how many and which Git repositories will be created, when's a good > time to migrate if there's some downtime etc. > > http://s.apache.org/8C1 lists numerous such migration requests to > infra, if you look at the struts-* tasks for example they migrated to > multiple Git repositories which seems to be a good idea. > > > > > My experience with Browsermap Git usage was, that on the SVN side it > looks > > a bit strange and quite unusual... > > I suppose we're talking about completely migrating to Git, not just > having a Git mirror like browsermap has? > > -Bertrand >
