Thanks, is there some action item for the project/PMC now or other parties?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> wrote: > I am listed in the page of Persons with signed CLAs but who are not (yet) > committers <http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas>. > FYI. > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Reza Naghibi > <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure I saw Volkan's agreement filed last month. > > > > > > > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Werner Keil < > > [email protected]> </div><div>Date:01/09/2015 9:08 AM (GMT-05:00) > > </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: > > </div><div>Subject: Re: Language roll call </div><div> > > </div>Good question, I guess the same still pending for Volkan. > > > > Should there be more than one PMC candidate even better;-) > > > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Reza Naghibi > > <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > Nice. I will add you guys to the list. Have you guys signed a > contributor > > > agreement? > > > > > > > > > > > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Craig > > Mason-Jones < > > > [email protected]> </div><div>Date:01/09/2015 2:17 AM (GMT-05:00) > > > </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: > > > </div><div>Subject: Re: Language roll call </div><div> > > > </div>Hi all, > > > > > > I'll help with the Go client. > > > > > > All the best, > > > Craig > > > > > > On 08/01/2015 15:39, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > You do not need a question mark next to my name for Scala, count me > in. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Reza Naghibi < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> They are. Im keeping the list here: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/branches/2.0/clients/README?view=markup > > > < > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/branches/2.0/clients/README?view=markup > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> < > > [email protected]> > > > >> To: [email protected] > > > >> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 8:00 AM > > > >> Subject: Re: Language roll call > > > >> > > > >> If they're so far uncovered yes. > > > >> > > > >> Werner > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Reza Naghibi > > > >> <[email protected] > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> Can I put you down for Closure and Python? > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Werner > Keil < > > > >>> [email protected] <[email protected]>> > > > </div><div>Date:01/08/2015 6:32 AM (GMT-05:00) > > > >>> </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: > > > >>> </div><div>Subject: Re: Language roll call </div><div> > > > >>> </div>Happy to help with all relevant JVM languages including Scala > > > guess > > > >>> there > > > >>> are at least > > > >>> - Groovy > > > >>> - Clojure > > > >>> and possibly the likes of > > > >>> - Ceylon or > > > >>> -Kotlin > > > >>> both driven by vendors but I don't think the latter two have such a > > bit > > > >>> market share. > > > >>> > > > >>> -Dart is another language by Google aiming at the Web and I know > > there > > > > > > >> > > > >> are > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> areas where it is used quite a bit. > > > >>> > > > >>> Aside from those I worked with > > > >>> -Python > > > >>> -Go > > > >>> -Objective C > > > >>> in the past and would be happy to help with their support. > > > >>> > > > >>> Werner > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Volkan Yazıcı < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>> For Scala, I do not think we need to ship another client, the Java > > API > > > > > > >> > > > >> is > > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> pretty slick and can be used as is with ease. In the worst case, I > > am > > > >>>> volunteered for the responsibility of the Scala client. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Reza Naghibi > > > >>>> <[email protected] > > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>>> So I was wondering who here would be comfortable contributing, > > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> developing, > > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> maintaining, and releasing software in the follow languages. You > do > > > > > > >> > > > >> not > > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> need to be an expert in said language, you just need to be able > to > > do > > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> those > > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> 4 tasks. Here are the languages: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -Ruby > > > >>>>> -Python > > > >>>>> -PHP > > > >>>>> -Lua > > > >>>>> -Perl > > > >>>>> -Scala > > > >>>>> -Lisp (or related dialect) > > > >>>>> -Haskell > > > >>>>> -Go > > > >>>>> -Objective C or Swift > > > >>>>> -Rust > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I skipped these languages because I believe we have them covered: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -C# and VB > > > >>>>> -C and C++ > > > >>>>> -Javascript > > > >>>>> -Java > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Did I miss any languages? Obviously the context here is our 2.0 > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> release. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
