Sorry, I wasn't too clear. I think the question is should we have people sign a contributor agreement before we actual vote them in as an official committer? I'm thinking the signed agreement comes after a successful vote... no?
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:01/11/2015 12:06 PM (GMT+01:00) </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: Contributor agreements </div><div> </div>That's common practice in Open Source communities. Before being voted on Bugzilla for a new Eclipse committer people also usually file Pull requests (Git is rather common there;-) or attach solutions to issues. AFAIK Volkan already did that, not sure about others. Werner On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Reza Naghibi < [email protected]> wrote: > Good point. So we should probably ask for said person to post their > contribution somewhere first. We review. Then vote. If it passes, then it's > official. > > I will still keep a list of people who would like to contribute to keep > things organized. > > > > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bertrand > Delacretaz <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:01/10/2015 4:28 PM > (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: > </div><div>Subject: Contributor agreements </div><div> > </div>On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Reza Naghibi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...Just make sure to get a contributor agreement signed and filed in the > next few months. If someone > > can start a thread on how to do that, that would be helpful.... > > See http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > > Submitting that does not make someone a DeviceMap committer of course > - that requires an election by the DeviceMap PMC. > > -Bertrand >
