Done. At least most try to help and collaborate while one still keeps breathing fire and brimstone on regular occasions;-|
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good, I guess we may also want to copy the README file Sling got in > the "whitspace" folder. > > For a preview or preliminary state like that of 2.0 matching tags would > also be a proper way to show and capture what's there as of now. > > Werner > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org> wrote: >> > .../release is only for released software which went thru the normal >> Apache >> > releasing procedures.... >> >> Sounds like a good convention to me, though from the ASF's point of >> view svn tags have no special meaning - it's the zip/tar archives that >> we vote on that constitute releases. >> >> > ... Im pretty certain that all of the tags and branches >> > you have made in the last 2 years were done outside of releasing >> procedures... >> >> Having svn tags that are unrelated to releases is fine. Unless we did >> this already we might just define some "sacred" areas under >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/devicemap/tags/ where people are not >> supposed to create tags at will. And add a README right there that >> explains that. >> >> -Bertrand >> > >
