Bertrand/Stefan/all, I guess technically either of you would be best to help or advise on what's best here. Apache guidelines: https://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html for the "currently active repository" (not sure, if 2.0 data even qualifies for "currently active"?) require "lazy consensus", so unless you have another opinion, trying to restore 2.0 data and then vote on what remaining PMC members want do do about JSON/2.0 sounds best.
As for license of the JSON or other device data, I'm sure, Bertrand will be of assistance, what Reza's fork needs to avoid trouble with Apache 2.0. Especially 4. Redistribution. is clearly applicable, if any existing data was used directly or as "derived work" which IMHO (not being Apache Legal team though;-) a transfer of the XML files into JSON means. WDYT? On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org> wrote: > I guess that was an over reaction to the lack of license on the JSON data. > I admit the timing could have been better. If you guys feel comfortable > with the data, revert the commits. As I stated in the other threads, I have > already forked my 2.0 work to a more peaceful space and will no longer be > making commits to this project's SVN. Look for another email from me in the > next day or with a more detailed explanation. > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Stefan Seelmann > > <m...@stefan-seelmann.de> wrote: > > > ...Why has data 2.0 been deleted?... > > > > I don't know why but it's these commits, from Reza: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/r1694312 > > http://svn.apache.org/r1694311 > > http://svn.apache.org/r1694310 > > > > Reza, can you explain what's going on? > > > > -Bertrand > > >
