Hi, On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, good to know, we'll try to expand on that, then, but, of course the real > problem is that DirectMemory has not any corporate sponsorship and is a tool > that addresses a niche requirement (applications that cope with HUGE > quantities of RAM). Not having a large diffusion it of course limits the > number of developers interested in contributing....
Having that kind of info in the board report is much better than the terse report that we received: it tells the board that the DirectMemory PMC is aware of the relative slowness of the project, and either doesn't think any actions are required at the moment, or thinks that things will slowly improve. As a board member, my main question when I read a project's report is "is this project viable or is it in trouble" - making us aware of *why* you think your project currently has little activity, and if you think this is a problem or not, helps. -Bertrand
