Dan Armbrust wrote:
After I added the schemas I was missing, it comes down to just these
two that don't appear to be supported:
caseExactOrderingMatch
integerOrderingMatch
When I comment out the appropriate ORDERING lines from my schema
(snippits below) then it works fine.
Should I file a bug report on these?
I think they are valid schema rules (though I don't know schema very
well - I wasn't the author of the schema files that I'm using)
Thanks,
Dan
Dan Armbrust wrote:
Now it is telling me that
javax.naming.NamingException: OID for name 'caseExactOrderingMatch'
was not found within the OID registry
for the following names:
caseExactOrderingMatch
integerOrderingMatch
Are these not supported, or am I still missing some schemas?
Can you check if they are in any of the schemas under the src/schemas
direectory? Might also be the order of terms in the attributeType
syntax. Parser follows strict order in RFC.
