I would very much prefer SL4J any over of the other options
as it properly separates the logging API from the
implementation.
Cheers, Steve.
From: Trustin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 1:20 AM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: [apacheds] Which logging framework?I think we need to vote now. Using Log4J can bring issues to other users who use other logging frameworks like java.util.logging. This is important because ApacheDS are designed to be embeddable. That's why I prefer SLF4J or Commons Logging.2005/7/1, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:There seems to be no object to using straight log4j. I'll ask one more
time before I start yanking out commons logging and putting in Log4J in
it's stead.Trustin
