2005/8/9, Alex Burmester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I suggest you to use 0.7.4-SNAPSHOT which resolves some management issues. (but these are trivial)
No you're not. We'll announce when 0.9 is really ready to replace 0.7 stream. :)
You can call acquire() method once more for the wrapped MINA buffers. That's all to prevent leakage. :)
I'm wondering if I should be trying to stick with the 0.7 branch and
upgrade to 0.7.4 on my next release or if I should start the migration to
the new api in the 0.9 mina.
I suggest you to use 0.7.4-SNAPSHOT which resolves some management issues. (but these are trivial)
I'd prefer to go with whichever is likely to be the most stable and so far
0.7 has been working fine for us but I don't want to fall too far behind
the current development.
No you're not. We'll announce when 0.9 is really ready to replace 0.7 stream. :)
I also seem to be running into a memory leak with java.nio.HeapByteBuffer
and it might be the same thing that was reported with the wrap() call.
I'll have to go look at the docs since there's a reference to something
about wrap() in the issue tracker.
You can call acquire() method once more for the wrapped MINA buffers. That's all to prevent leakage. :)
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
