Sorry about that. Use the LdapContext to implement your own custom partition. It would be pretty straight forward as the api's are pretty close.
Marc On 8/11/05, Jérôme Baumgarten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe I missed your point. Do you mean to provide my own implementation of > javax.naming.ldap.LdapContext to the application accessing the LDAP server ? > Or do you suggest to write my own custom partition and then go with > JDNI to access the existing LDAP server ? > > Anyway, would it be that hard if I wanted to write an LDAP context to > make Eve act as a proxy server ? > > Jérôme > > On 8/11/05, Marc Boorshtein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think anyone's published an LDAP context. If all you want to > > do is log requests & responses, it should be pretty straight forward > > to just use the LdapContext to to perform various LDAP operations. > > > > Marc > > > > On 8/11/05, Jérôme Baumgarten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > In this PowerPoint presentation > > > (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1&url=https%3A//karasulu.homeip.net/svn/akarasulu/apachecon/eve-presentation/eve-intro-long.ppt&ei=DTb7QuLIE8emQeOnwNMB), > > > I've read that it is possible to use Eve as a proxy to an existing > > > LDAP server. > > > > > > I actually want to do this to first see what an off-the-shelf > > > application exactly sends to my LDAP server. > > > > > > But I've not been able to find any reference on the way to set this > > > up. I could write my own partition ad described in the section "Custom > > > Partition" (http://wiki.apache.org/directory/ApacheDirectoryServer) > > > but there might already exist a more straightforward way. > > > > > > The second step is a bit more complicated but it seems that with some > > > coding that should be possible. To make that off-the-shelf application > > > work my own LDAP using custom model and schema, I would need to be > > > able to "catch" incoming requests and under some conditions > > > re-evaluate search to return the correct results. According to that > > > same presentation, I believe that I should go for the Interceptor. Is > > > there any information available out there to help me deal with it ? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jérôme > > > > > >
