>> There is a lack of (SP)* in refinements, I think. Nothing serious.
>
> I see. I was not very generous about ( SP )* when I wrote
> SubtreeSpecification grammar, hehe. Now can you check:
>
> http://rafb.net/paste/results/JQ717550.html
>
> I also updated specificExclusions rule.
nopaste may not store it forever so here it's:
refinements returns [ArrayList children]
{
log.debug( "entered refinements()" );
children = null;
ExprNode child = null;
ArrayList tempChildren = new ArrayList();
}
:
OPEN_CURLY ( SP )*
(
child=refinement ( SP )*
{
tempChildren.add( child );
}
( ( SP )* SEP ( SP )* child=refinement ( SP )*
{
tempChildren.add( child );
} )*
)? CLOSE_CURLY
{
children = tempChildren;
}
;
specificExclusions
{
log.debug( "entered specificExclusions()" );
}
:
OPEN_CURLY ( SP )*
( specificExclusion ( SP )*
( SEP ( SP )* specificExclusion ( SP )* )*
)?
CLOSE_CURLY
;
-- Ersin
