[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIREVE-256?page=all ]
     
Alex Karasulu resolved DIREVE-256:
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Applied and committed patch in revision 291232 here: 

http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=291232

Also added new test case to apache-server main in commit 291234 here:

http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=291234

> Extended operation causes client to hang
> ----------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DIREVE-256
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIREVE-256
>      Project: Directory Server
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: protocol
>     Versions: 0.9.3, 0.9.2
>     Reporter: Stefan Zoerner
>     Assignee: Alex Karasulu
>     Priority: Minor
>  Attachments: UnknownExtendedOperationTest.java, patch_DIREVE-256.txt
>
> If a client calls an arbitrary extended operation, the server (namely the 
> ExtendedHandler) throws a NotImplementedException. After this, the call of 
> the client blocks, and the client hangs. 
> I suggest to change the handler to simply send an error code 2 
> (LDAP_PROTOCOL_ERROR) with message "Unrecognized extended operation" back to 
> the client. This is the expected behavior if an extended operation is not 
> supported by the server.
> Attached you find a test case, which demands an always unknown extended 
> operation (OID=1.1) and checks the result. Error code 2 leads to a 
> CommunicationException in JNDI. I have tested this with several LDAP server 
> implementations, behavior was always as expected. 
> I have also attached a patch, which changes the ExtendedHandler to behave 
> like described above. Not a big thing, but it leads to compliant behavior for 
> extended ops, even if we do not have any in place yet.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to