On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 07:40 +1000, Nick Faiz wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > > On 12/10/2005, at 5:09 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > > > As far as ApacheDS is concerned, and it seems to be, there is no > > urge to > > change a choice made back in July, 6. > > > > How is there no urge to make ApacheDS embeddable? We currently cannot > embed ApacheDS in applications using log4j.
Sorry, but I think that the urgence is to make ApacheDS usable and stable ... Embeddable is number 3 in the list for 1.0 GA. That means fixing bugs and adding lacking fonctions. This is what we are actually working at. Of course, I just express my very own opinion :) -- Emmanuel
